Crunchys PAC Application V7

[Ubermolen 90]

+1 I believe that with Pac crunchy would be able to enhance the to experience of himself and others. Good luck

[Crunchy 132]

>>UPDATE<<

I have added more PAC Examples

Thank you, everyone, for your support as well

[Joel 90]

Quite a few people are comenting that crunchy's pac examples are not very original even before he added more his pacs where anything but not original his navy pac I have never seen anyone do well which he has actually completed to a decent quality 
and for that I am going to give this application a B I G 

+1

[Bene 20]

+1 very active and helpful member of the community. Love the PAC examples

[Crunchy 132]

>>BUMP<<

Thank you for all the support so far.

[Splonter 341]

+1, it’s evident he is dedicated towards achieving this and I believe Crunchy would use this tool efficiently and effectively.

[Crunchy 132]

>>BUMP<<

I am now in Riot and will be making some Riot related Pacs.

[Noodles 56]

I honestly think your PAC's are really, really well designed for someone who is applying for tier 1. You don't need to be a god at PAC to achieve tier 1, as long as you make average PAC's (which you have provided), I think your qualified for the tool.

PLUS ONE

[Crunchy 132]

>>>BUMP<<<

[Sully 662]

NEUTRAL

 

Positives:

• Seems to have good intentions when it comes to why he wants PAC3 and what he will do with it
• Made Some unique PAC's compared to others seen in the past (The navy ones)
• Good playtime and have seen you around the server frequently

Negatives:

• From prior comments it seems that you advertised your application, which breaches the rules
• Some of the pack examples are not refined enough and need more time and effort put in to achieve a better quality (eg. the navy one, the arm is twisted and looks unnatural.) spending more time on the examples will show that you are more deserving of PAC3 and are willing to put in the effort and time to make good and approriate RP PAC's.

 

None the less I am close to giving you a +1 and if you add some more example that you spend longer working on or fix some of the pre existing example then i will be inclined to change my NEUTRAL to a +1.

 

Good luck and all the best,

- Sully

[Nomos 1]

+1 good pacs, becoming active.
the fact he advertised seems like a genuine mistake.

 

[Crunchy 132]

21 hours ago, Sully said:

NEUTRAL

 

Positives:

• Seems to have good intentions when it comes to why he wants PAC3 and what he will do with it
• Made Some unique PAC's compared to others seen in the past (The navy ones)
• Good playtime and have seen you around the server frequently

Negatives:

• From prior comments it seems that you advertised your application, which breaches the rules
• Some of the pack examples are not refined enough and need more time and effort put in to achieve a better quality (eg. the navy one, the arm is twisted and looks unnatural.) spending more time on the examples will show that you are more deserving of PAC3 and are willing to put in the effort and time to make good and approriate RP PAC's.

 

None the less I am close to giving you a +1 and if you add some more example that you spend longer working on or fix some of the pre existing example then i will be inclined to change my NEUTRAL to a +1.

 

Good luck and all the best,

- Sully

the times i "advertised" was me private messaging them on the fourms saying "Hey there, ive added some more pac examples on my application and hopefully this can change your opinion from a neutral to a +1" i never knew i wasnt allowed to say that but i stopped doing it due to the comment the cody made

[Jman1308 100]

Denied

Please work on improving your support within the community.

You may reapply in 1 month. (21/01/19)