Skears Tier 1 Pac3 application

[Skears 1]

Steam Details

Steam Name:SaD.Skears

Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:22166161

Steam Profile link:https://steamcommunity.com/id/Skears/

In Game Details

In Game Name: Skears

In Game Rank: Lieutenant Colonel

In Game Regiment: Shore

Time Played (Server Time/ Must Provide Screenshot evidence): 

 

PAC3 Questions

Have you used PAC Before: Yes i use it in single player somtimes

Why should you be trusted with PAC (1 Paragraph): I would not try to try to crash the server by having a crazy PAC. I have been on the server for almost 2 months and i own a reg this is my favorite server.

Why do you want access to PAC (1 Paragraph): I would like to do more with my player then just the normal look to want to stand out so people recognizes me because i'm different from the rest of the troopers and i would have some cool PAC design.

 

 

 

Why do you believe you deserve PAC (1 Paragraph): I will not be a minge and i Fear RP a lot, I've wanted PAC ever since i was an st because i like how they look and if you use them right you can make something cool out of it. Also Shore is a kind of basic design so i just want to make some cool shore PAC.

PAC3 Examples:
 

 

 

[EpicEzale 123]

-1 I love your PAC3 creations but unfortunately your application has no detail and all your answers are literally 1 sentence when it says "1 Paragraph."

 

Edited September 22, 2018 by EpicEzale

[Emerald 544]

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

[Rickle 306]

3 minutes ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

-1

Reasons stated above ^^^^

-Rickle.

[Wind 39]

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

 

[Snoozy 134]

5 minutes ago, Rickle said:

-1

Reasons stated above ^^^^

-Rickle.

-1 
You need to put a lot more effort into your application sorry dude.

[Helsing 91]

40 minutes ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

Unfortunately i agree with Emerald here. If you can improve on what is listed, i'd consider changing my response.

Good Luck!

[Galle 31]

43 minutes ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

 

[Brass 308]

-1

Spoiler

56 minutes ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

 

 

 

 

[pinejack 596]

1 hour ago, Wind said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

 

-1

[Shepard 115]

2 hours ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

^
-1
what even are those answers? 

[Fox 270]

Damn, Shore PAC, i was looking forward to this.

But it sucks that you have put no effort into the app man. 

-1

Willing to change!

[Bailey 645]

3 hours ago, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

Opinion is always subject to change.

[Crunchy 134]

-1 reasons stated

[Peguin 61]

On 9/22/2018 at 9:21 PM, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

What Em said. -1

[Tonberry 104]

 - Minimal effort in application
 - Has not yet stepped up to set a positive example for his regiment ingame
 - In the majority of my experience with you on the server, I seldom see serious roleplay from you
 - Have been informed by past members of Shore (and have personally observed) you AFKing for long periods of time to increase server time 
 - None of your reasons have anything to do with the experience of other players on the server, it's all about 'looking cool' for your personal satisfaction

Conclusion: Although getting PAC3 may improve your personal experience on the server, I think there are players who will also enhance the immersion of other players if given PAC, and for that reason, they deserve it more.

-1
 

[Joel 65]

On ‎9‎/‎22‎/‎2018 at 8:51 PM, Emerald said:

-1

I don't really think you deserve PAC3 as you're pretty inactive and also because I've never seen you engage in RP.

• PAC3 Examples are really basic and don't really interest me.
• Most of the answers to the Questions look rushed.
• You're pretty inactive and I never see you do any RP.

Also your answers seem to say you want it for your own need and to look cool because you "own a regiment"

[Hammer 35]

Neutral

Could be more active

[Planz 117]

-1
Haven't seen you on in a while
Pac Application is very brief.
Pac Examples are Quite Basic

Overall, I don't believe you have put enough effort into this application required to receive Tier 1

Regardless, Goodluck ;D
Cheers, Planz

[Jman1308 71]

Denied

Insufficient positive community feedback. Please improve your application with more detail as well as get more known and engage more in RP on the SWRP server.

You may reapply in 1 month. (21/01/19)