Sierl's Pac Application - Improved

[Austro]

What is your In-game name: Sierl

 

Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:37903346

 

Steam link: http://steamcommunity.com/id/austrovcx/

 

Play time: 4days +

 

Have you used PAC Before: Yes I have used PAC before. I've used it a couple of times in Single Player to understand how it works and since then I now have a basic understanding and I've created some for my server character.

 

 

Why should you be trusted with PAC (1 Paragraph):

I think I should be trusted with PAC because I always ensure that the server is friendly and people don't try to troll or ruin someone's experience on the server which makes me believe strongly in the rules of the server. I respect and honour the staff and respect the RP and the friendly encounters with people. Doing this allows me to give my trust to others and they give their trust back which allows us to build further on that.  

 

 

Why do you want PAC (1 Paragraph):  

If I was to get PAC it would assist me in certain events for different themes which adds a level of "spice" to my character and if I was given PAC I would only use it for the sole reason of RP which means I would not break any RP Regulations by adding something ridiculous to my belt, body, helmet, etc and these would not suit my characters needs or suit my uniform in my regiment. Doing this is ultimately fail-RP so I would always make my character look "himself".

 

 

Why do you deserve PAC (1 Paragraph): I believe I deserve PAC not only because I am a trustworthy and loyal member of Imperial Gaming and I love and respect the Staff and the Server but I also try to help the community (even though I'm not a staff member) I try to keep this server as clean and friendly from Minges. This allows me to interact and help others which I like doing so they can feel welcome on the server.



Very Basic Pac's ahead.
 

Spoiler

 

 

Edited January 8, 2018 by Sierl

[FrenchyFries]

I think there's a rule on making another app when the first one doesn't get a clean record just be used you got -1's shouldn't mean you give up like "BAM". 

Even still, making a new isn't like making a fresh start you have a high chance of getting the same responses. Take the feedback and deal with it maybe even use it. 

[Wooden Shed]

+1

Well written and punctuated

 

 

+1

Active and deserves PAC3

 

[Twinkie]

-1 Still has an application open.

 

 

Edited January 8, 2018 by Twinkie

[Marsh]

Just now, Twinkie said:

-1 Still has an application open.

 

[Zappa]

Hasn't even been 2 weeks lmao @Ridge

[Austro]

8 minutes ago, FrenchyFries said:

I think there's a rule on making another app when the first one doesn't get a clean record just be used you got -1's shouldn't mean you give up like "BAM". 

Even still, making a new isn't like making a fresh start you have a high chance of getting the same responses. Take the feedback and deal with it maybe even use it. 

I took the feedback from the previous one and 100% agreed, I put no effort into it and it was badly written. Hence why this one, in my opinion, is written well for my standards.
Aswell I could not add proof of my pacs in the previous one as spoilers would not work idk why.
But thank you for the comment & Feedback.

[Twinkie]

6 minutes ago, Sierl said:

I took the feedback from the previous one and 100% agreed, I put no effort into it and it was badly written. Hence why this one, in my opinion, is written well for my standards.
Aswell I could not add proof of my pacs in the previous one as spoilers would not work idk why.
But thank you for the comment & Feedback.

If you wanted to put more effort in just update the other one and post an update in the thread chat. This is disobeying rules set in place to stop people from doing exactly this.