Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Rachel

    Rachel

    Members


    • Points

      25

    • Content Count

      13


  2. Kristofer

    Kristofer

    Imperial Staff Manager


    • Points

      12

    • Content Count

      913


  3. Pro

    Pro

    Members


    • Points

      11

    • Content Count

      91


  4. Joel

    Joel

    Senior Moderator


    • Points

      10

    • Content Count

      375


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/01/2021 in all areas

  1. Hello, for those who do not know me, I am Rachel a not so active forums user but an active member in the Imperial Gaming GMOD Community. I have recently left the spot of SKY Commander because of my own personal reasons knowing Lister, the current ACO, will do a good job with the regiment, I am still however in charge until Lister is out of the ACO stage so I have been helping him and still bonding with the SKY members. I have recently heard about how the 275th SKY Division will be removed and this has got me so confused to why this is happening, everyone in the regiment is doing just fine
    21 points
  2. Yeah I agree with this. Sky troopers are undoubtedly the most unique regiment on the server with an entirely different playstyle compared to every other regiment in the army branch. The Sky Division is the only regiment on the server that allows flight without the requirements of a starfighter (Except Inquisitors). You're effectively deleting a regiment on the server that holds that distinction for whatever it's getting replaced with; there's nothing more distinct and unique than the ability to fly with a jetpack. Additionally, the Sky Division an active regiment with dedicated playe
    12 points
  3. I 100% agree that the removal of sky is a bad decision. Sky has been doing really well right now. I don’t see how a perfectly good regiment should be removed from the server without the approval from all of skys current members and IHC. I know for a fact that myself and noni disagree with this decision. Removing sky seems be the biased and replacing it with a new regiment and commander. replacing a good ACO of an active regiment and not even consulting all members of IHC and SKY first, seems like a mistake. I wasn’t given a say in this and I’m glad someone made a forums post.
    11 points
  4. I completely agree with this. The way in which they have been removed/replaced is completely stupid. Someone who currently does not even play the server enough to be considered active came in and donated for a regiment which shouldn't honestly have been up on the dono store in the 1st place because they had an extremely active ACO and anextremely active regiment who take up almost the entire company. they love the regiment and have shown countless dedication yet are just being told that it's being taken away. I honestly think this is really biased as no one else would really be able to com
    9 points
  5. Well it’s been a regiment on the server for a long time and is yet to fully fail, they have also placed 2nd on the elite regiment board for this month meaning that they have had the 2nd most placings of all Military regiments meaning they are doing quite well I’d say.
    9 points
  6. This doesn't make any sense Sky is literally insanely active especially for an Army Regiment.
    8 points
  7. Hey All. I'll start by sharing our perspective on it and how we were viewing the situation. When we initially brought in the Army Restructure, one of the strengths that was immediately clear was how flexible it could be with new regiments being brought in and out as the months progress. Gusky and I were keen to see this strength realised which when Rachel stepped down from Sky, we thought it would be a good opportunity to explore possibilities. When we were discussing this decision 2-3 days ago, Sky had Lister as a potential CO as well as 5 players including him that had been on the
    6 points
  8. Why is an army regiment being removed without the consultation/approval from anyone within AHC? What’s the point of having AHC if higher powers are just going to go over their heads with army changes. It genuinely confuses me that it’s at the point where AHC have to raise awareness to the public about their dis-approval about army changes forced by higher powers that they themselves should be the ones giving the approval for.
    6 points
  9. I also agree that swapping SKY out at the moment is a bad call. Changing up a regiment that's empty or only has 1 or 2 active members is one thing, but as it's been very clearly stated SKY is doing rather well at the moment. I'll agree that a little bit of small change to regiments might be quite refreshing and welcome, but there's definatley something better we can do than this.
    6 points
  10. I am honestly disgusted that this was even approved, removing an active regiment that has a dedicated commander for a custom regiment for someone who doesn't even play on the server. The clear bias from management towards a few members of the community is stupid I am not sorry if you think this comment is out of line
    5 points
  11. I just had somebody explain what happened to me, it took approximately 7 seconds to come to the conclusion that this is a dumb decision. More thought needs to be given to decisions that affect your playerbase. Look at the outcome of this decision, I have never seen a decision more unanimously hated by the community. This just shows an absolute lack of care for the people affected by this decision. That is all that is worth saying. I am very disappointed.
    5 points
  12. Steam Name: Crispin Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:54183216 Steam Profile link: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198068632161/ In Game Details In Game Name: Crispin In Game Rank: Private In Game Regiment: Stormtrooper Corp. Ban Details How long was the ban for: Permanent Which staff member banned you: XIV-I 'Siege' What date did the ban occur: 12-01-21 What was the reason f
    4 points
  13. I completely agree with the statement and find it really unfair, I've always noticed that sky usually get placings either 1st or 2nd and the hard work all their troopers put in, it seems much more unfair that you've gotten second place on the elite regiment board yet people are talking about removing it? It makes no sense due to how well sky are working so hard out in the field just for their regiment to be thrown into shambles, I'm pretty sure this was just off poor decision making and I hope who ever thought about it in the first place will re-think the entire idea.
    4 points
  14. It dose seem counter productive to me to remove them. no point in getting rid of 7 people
    4 points
  15. I agree with this, sky is currently missing one person, whatever regiment it gets replaced with be displacing 7 people. Sky is also 2nd place on the elite regiment board so they obviously are doing very well (FT first ). I completely disagree with the removal of sky troopers unless some overwhelming reason is given as to why sky should be replaced.
    4 points
  16. I'll put it really simply, No. Whilst the Sky Division don't particularly have any other job then 'fly & flank', that shouldn't remove the fact that they are the ONLY regiment currently capable of such things with such ease. ISC, too obvious. CompForce, easily spotted by Thermals & Weapons. Removing Sky Troopers does have its positives, but the negatives dramatically outweigh those of the positives; it yields no benefit to the Army, from an IC & OOC standpoint. Whilst I will admit guarding Engine Room for hours on end is shit & boring, the roster for Sky has always be
    3 points
  17. If you are not trying to add anything meaningful to this topic just stop replying.
    3 points
  18. i wasnt going to speak my mind because i dont like being a bother but last night i honestly felt like leaving the community and gmod rp in general the same mistakes just keep getting repeated time and time again new regiments dont succeed past the first few months unless they are far outside the scope of any other regiment there no point imo adding another reg thats a cookie cutter infantry based reg when the one getting replaced is one of the most unique army regiments in terms of combat tactics
    3 points
  19. 2 points
  20. IF IT AINT BROKE DON'T FIX IT mic drop love you sky <3
    2 points
  21. @Dirthi fucking lame should've had your pants off as well @Cecil would you allow it please VIDEO.mp4
    2 points
  22. Don't know where to start for this one. Guess I'll start from my beginning; had 5 hours on gmod which was used on horror maps I played with friends. Got bored of that so we went to minge on SWRP. Trained by Natiionz a few years ago, joined Nova which had @Lucky in it. Got me real into the server. From Nova I went to Navy, enjoyed my time there, was under @Keta. Met some cool people in there, can't remember em all long time ago, except for @Rad_Copnice dude. From Navy went to Storm Commandos, joined for @Arkanstayed for Arcturusious, met a whole bunch of good people in that regiment. @Auzii, @M
    1 point
  23. Bailey wasnt the one behind this, he was intending to take varactyl/riot not sky
    1 point
  24. My boys in SKY doing us all proud. Wouldn't be the same if they got removed. Reckon Lister will be a good fit and everyone else in SKY are doing commendable. Not gonna lie though being an EC against SKY can sometimes be disheartening.
    1 point
  25. Disclaimer: @Bailey has allowed me to post on this appeal. Crispin, I know you and I have never really seen eye-to-eye; I am the main reason why. I've pushed you away and shamed you, citing that you were one of the most troublesome and manipulative players I had ever dealt with during my tenure in the staff team in 2017 and 2018. I've held an extremely negative opinion of you that has never been challenged and therefore has never had the chance to mature and change. But after having a chat with some of your older friends when they visited the IG server, I learned that there were many el
    1 point
  26. There is no problem whatsoever with Sky at the moment, there has really been no problem since the change from JT to 17th Sky, Sky is definitely one of the best regiments to go to when you want to have some amazing fun. When I was in Sky I had such a fun time whether it be in events or just training, removing the jetpack regiment just removes variety from the army. In my opinion Sky should be the last regiment to consider removing from army.
    1 point
  27. Just to clarify, crispin has been allowed to make this appeal
    1 point
  28. I was not the one who made the call, I assume this will all eventually be explained by Gusky, until then, its just best to wait.
    1 point
  29. There have been an overwhelming ratio of ST's to other regs in the last week atleast I have noticed. I personally do not believe we need to be cutting down and if anything we should be adding new regiments and more slots. I would like to hear a counter argument.
    1 point
  30. +1 Crispin, You have appealed many, many times now and each time its been denied and most of the time I've decided to keep away from the appeal because I wasn't aware enough about the situation to make an opinion and there were many things that happened that I wasn't here for, that I am sure other members of the Staff Team may bring up if they find this appeal and decide to comment on it. I am +1'ing this appeal because of the sheer dedication you've shown to an unban, you've been playing on another Community in recent times and seem to genuinely enjoy playing the game and want to
    1 point
  31. Alright, for this ban appeal I'm going to be leaving a +1 I remember that you were a massive minge when you were banned and your previous appeals were quite interesting since then, and I expected to come into this leaving a -1. However, from the appeal, and from what I've heard about your behaviour on other servers, and also that it's been a solid 3-4 years since your ban that you should be given the opportunity to come back to the server. Because at this point if you've dedicated this much effort just to come back and minge on the server I would be extremely suprised. Good Luck with the
    1 point
  32. Neutral Banned permanently, after causing many issues for the community, alting, minging etc Has seemingly played other servers more recently without causing issues, minging, etc Ban Appeal seems genuine, however, more details on your initial ban would be useful
    1 point
  33. Hey its Cousin Donny, go down to the Mess Hall to see him.
    1 point
  34. Alright, I think everyone's opinions on the matter have been made clear. I'm going to be locking the post from any additional input so it doesn't get completely flooded. I understand people are frustrated, however that does not excuse the disrespect towards management and other members of the community. Thank you everyone for your input.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to Sydney/GMT+11:00
×
×
  • Create New...